How to achieve big goals in small steps: the decomposition method

In business, large-scale goals often scare the team and block progress. However, big tasks can be turned into a series of clear and measurable steps. In this article, we’ll look at what goal decomposition is, why it works in modern business, what practical steps to use, and how to avoid common mistakes.

What is decomposition and how to calculate it

Decomposition is the systematic decomposition of a large, often abstract goal into a set of interrelated, clearly defined sub-goals and objectives. The idea is simple: instead of keeping one big, vague goal in mind, we create a map of clear steps, each of which is measured and monitored. This approach reduces cognitive load, increases the predictability of the result, and allows you to record intermediate successes.

Decomposition formula

Formally, you can write the decomposition as follows:

where:

• G – the main goal;
• gi – sub-goals (parts) within the overall goal;
• n – number of sub-goals.

This equation emphasizes that the set of sub-goals forms the full scope of work leading to the achievement of G.

Decomposition is conveniently evaluated through a weighted average, where each sub-goal is assigned a weight – an indicator of its relative impact on the final result. The formula looks like this:

where:

• P – aggregate progress towards the goal (0…1 or 0…100%);
• wi – weight of sub-objective iii (reflects its contribution to the final goal);
• ci – degree of fulfillment of sub-objective iii (from 0 to 1).

The principle is that a sub-goal with a higher weight has a stronger impact on overall progress. The weights can be normalized so that ∑wi = 1 or ∑wi = 100 – the important thing is to use a single scale throughout the model.

An example of the formula application

Let’s imagine that the company’s goal is to increase annual revenue by 20%. We decompose it into three sub-goals and estimate their weights according to the expected impact on revenue:

1. New product launch – weight w1 = 50 (expected contribution to revenue growth is the highest).
2. Marketing optimization – weight w2 = 30.
3. Increasing website conversion – weight w3 = 20.

Normalize the weights by the sum of 100 (you can also set them as 0.5, 0.3, 0.2). Let’s assume that the current state of subgoals is as follows:

• c1 = 1.0 (product launch is 100% complete),
• c2 = 0.5 (marketing is 50% complete),
• c3 = 0.0 (work on the website has not yet begun).

Substitute them into the formula:

So, despite the fact that 1 of the 3 areas has actually been fully implemented, the weighted assessment shows 65% progress towards the goal – because the most influential element (product launch) has been completed. This model provides a more realistic view of goal achievement than simply counting the number of completed subgoals.

Why decomposition works in business

Decomposition is effective not because of fashion, but because of a number of simple reasons that change the way we organize work and make decisions. Below are five key mechanisms of its action.

Manageability: reducing uncertainty and isolating risks

Large goals are hidden behind a set of unknown factors, which makes forecasting and planning difficult. Breaking down the goal into parts makes each element visible for evaluation in terms of resources, time, and dependencies. As a result, management receives control points at which errors can be detected and the course can be adjusted in time without putting the entire initiative at risk. This turns an abstract plan into a set of manageable interventions that are easier to adapt to market realities.

Responsibility: clarity of roles and faster decision-making

When tasks are specific and formulated through the expected result, it becomes easy to assign a responsible person. Such clarity reduces the time spent on coordination and reduces the number of misunderstandings. Responsibility ceases to be an abstract requirement, which increases the discipline of execution and allows for localized problem solving without unnecessary escalation.

Metrics and control: formalizing feedback

Dividing into smaller components automatically simplifies the measurement of progress. Shorter evaluation intervals give a clear picture of performance and allow you to separate process problems from strategy problems. Managers get the tools to quickly verify hypotheses and make informed decisions, and the team gets honest signals about what’s working and what needs attention. The result is faster corrections and less risky investments in questionable areas.

Motivation: small victories and sustained engagement

People are more likely to stay active and focused when they see the results of their work. Decomposition turns a large, distant success into a series of visible achievements that keep morale up and give a sense of progress. This not only increases productivity but also reduces burnout.

Strategic transparency: linking operations to business results

By breaking down the goal into parts, it becomes clear which actions have a real impact on key business indicators. This allows top management to make informed decisions about priorities and investments. The illusion of ineffective activity disappears, and real visibility of the ratio of effort to effect appears. As a result, the company learns to invest in what works and to abandon what only creates the illusion of progress.

When decomposition is mandatory

There are a number of typical business situations when decomposition ceases to be optional and becomes critical to success.

1. Launching a new product or feature.

When you introduce a new product to the market, the number of dependencies and uncertainties increases: technical integrations, supply, marketing, customer support. Decomposition allows you to verify assumptions step by step – from prototype to sales – and distribute risks so that mistakes in one area do not paralyze the entire launch.

2. Scaling departments or processes.

Team expansion or automation creates new points of interaction and potential trouble spots. Breaking the project down into sub-goals helps prioritize which roles to introduce first, which processes to standardize first, and how to consistently measure growth performance.

3. Business model transformation.

Switching to a different monetization model or entering a new segment affects the product, operations, and finance at the same time. Without a consistent decomposition, it is impossible to gradually test hypotheses and assess their impact.

4. Setting ambitious quarterly or annual goals.

Long-term and large-scale goals can easily lose focus and energize the team. Breaking it down into intermediate milestones, clear criteria, and interim deadlines makes the goal manageable and allows you to keep the pace of execution without dissipating resources.

Step-by-step decomposition methodology for business

For decomposition to work not at the level of theory, but to bring tangible results, it is important to build a consistent process. Below are the main steps that help turn a big goal into a real action plan.

Step 1. Formulate the main goal

Start by defining the end point – the result you want to achieve. It can be profit growth, entering a new market, or increasing the share of loyal customers. The goal should be specific, measurable, and realistic, but at the same time ambitious enough to motivate the team.

Step 2. Identify key areas leading to the goal

Each major business goal usually relies on several areas of activity. For example, increasing profits may include cost optimization, increasing sales, and improving customer retention. This division helps to see the structure of the goal and understand how it can be achieved.

Step 3. Break down the areas into specific tasks

Next, you should detail each area by identifying what specific actions need to be taken. For example, to increase sales, it can be the launch of new advertising channels, expanding the range of products, or implementing a CRM system. At this stage, it’s important not to lose the logic: each task should directly lead to the achievement of the overall goal.

Step 4. Assign responsibilities and set deadlines

No strategy works without clear responsibility. Each task should have an executor or team, as well as a realistic deadline. This creates transparency in the process and allows you to control the movement towards the result. In corporate governance, this stage is often recorded through OKR or SMART systems to avoid vague wording.

Step 5. Define control metrics and reporting methods

When the goal structure is ready, it is important to fix the indicators that demonstrate progress. These can be quantitative or qualitative metrics, such as the percentage of completed tasks, sales growth, and customer satisfaction. Regular reporting allows you to adjust actions in time if something goes wrong.

Step 6. Check the consistency of all levels

At the final stage, make sure that all parts of the system are logically interconnected: each task is subordinated to a specific direction, and each direction is subordinated to the main goal. This check ensures that the team’s efforts are directed in one vector.

When the step-by-step structure is already in place, it remains to choose the tools that will help keep the system in working order. To do this, you can use ready-made templates and digital solutions that simplify control, analytics, and team interaction.

Practical examples of using decomposition

Let’s look at two real-life examples of how decomposition first impacted business.

Operation Crush (Intel): How a large-scale goal turned into a measurable plan

The OKR system originates from practices developed at Intel in the 1970s under the leadership of Andy Grove. During the microprocessor market crisis, the company launched the Operation Crush campaign. The goal of the campaign was to quickly regain market share by coordinating sales, technical support, and marketing. The operation included clear goals for regional teams and measurable success indicators, making it a classic example of business decomposition. In other words, an ambitious strategy was translated into concrete, trackable actions.

Operation Crush demonstrates that high ambitions work when backed by an operational map with clear milestones, responsibilities, and metrics. This is an example of how one central goal and a set of measurable key results can mobilize an organization and ensure coordinated execution.

Google: massive OKR adoption and short review cycles

When Google was just getting started, investor John Doerr brought the OKR system he inherited from Intel to the company. Google has widely used the OKR methodology to align teams and accelerate product development. In practice, Google’s OKRs act as a framework: goals define the direction, and key results are specific, measurable sub-goals. Regular check-ins and the desire to set ambitious goals are important practices that keep the innovation momentum going and allow for quick course corrections. A basic guide from Google is available in the Re:Work project. Rework.

Thus, a formalized OKR framework, combined with regular check-ins, allows you to turn abstract ambitions into concrete and measurable sub-goals. Transparency of OKRs (where appropriate) helps to align teams and reduce duplication of effort.

Common mistakes in decomposition and how to avoid them

Starting the decomposition is only half the battle. The other half is doing it right. Often, mistakes arise not because of a lack of knowledge, but because of the desire to «do everything at once» or because of an uncritical approach to evaluating the results. Below are five common pitfalls that often slow down progress and simple ways to avoid them.

1. Excessive detail.

When a task is broken down to the smallest detail, the team spends time managing a list of small steps instead of actually working. This often looks like endless subtasks in a task manager that are difficult to control and create a sense of busyness, but do not move the business forward. To avoid this, agree on the minimum size of the «work unit»: the task should have a clear result and be completed in a reasonable amount of time (days or weeks, not months). If the task is too small, combine it with several related activities, and if it is too large, break it down to a level where progress can be easily assessed.

2. Wrong choice of metrics.

A team may be actively performing work and yet not achieving the desired business result if the metrics reflect activity rather than impact. For example, the number of calls made won’t tell you about sales growth if there’s no correlation between calls and deals. Therefore, choose metrics that directly correlate with the ultimate goal: measure not just the effort, but the effect of that effort. Periodically check whether the metric really shows progress, and don’t be afraid to replace it if you find a weak connection to the result.

3. Blurred responsibility.

When it’s not clear who is responsible for a particular result, tasks are «thrown» between people, delayed or partially completed. In business, this leads to missed deadlines and lower quality. Avoid this situation by assigning a specific responsible person for each task and recording not only the name, but also the expected result and deadline.

4. Ignoring risks.

A plan looks good on paper until unexpected events occur, such as a delivery delay, regulatory changes, or technical problems. If risks are not recorded and assessed, they turn the plan into a source of constant crises. Therefore, for each key milestone, make a brief risk assessment: what events can disrupt it, what is the probability and what is the impact. Add a simple mitigation plan to each risk – this will allow you to respond quickly and at minimal cost.

5. Excessive focus on the process instead of the result.

Processes are necessary, but they are not an end in themselves. Sometimes an organization gets caught up in optimizing procedures and monitoring execution, forgetting to check whether it really brings them closer to the main goal. To avoid falling into this trap, regularly ask yourself a simple question: «Does this bring us closer to our main goal?» If you are not sure of the positive answer, then reconsider the feasibility of the activity or redirect resources to those tasks that have a greater impact.

Knowing common mistakes and simple rules for avoiding them greatly improves the chances of a successful decomposition. Next, we’ll look at how to integrate these principles into your company’s daily processes and maintain efficiency at all levels of the organization.

How to integrate decomposition into existing company processes

To make decomposition work on a regular basis, it should not only be applied once, but also implemented as part of the operational culture. Below is a table that will help you quickly transfer the recommendations to your workflow.

Pilot, standardize, synchronize, and then scale. Decomposition works when it’s simple, clear, and repeatable; start with one goal today to get a systematic approach to strategy execution tomorrow.

Serhii Ivanchenko

CEO

Author's page